Saturday, December 1, 2018

Public Affairs Section Notice of Funding Opportunity-FY2019


kh.usembassy.gov


uncaptioned image from entry

Funding Opportunity Title:             U.S. Embassy Phnom Penh PAS Annual Program Statement
Funding Opportunity Number:      PAS-CB-600-19-PAS-0003
Deadline for Applications:               Rolling Basis until September 1, 2019, see Section 4 for reviewing deadlines
CFDA Number:                                19.040 – Public Diplomacy [JB emphasis] programs
Total Amount Available:                 $20,000
Maximum for Each Award:            $20,000

A.PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The U.S. Embassy Phnom Penh Public Affairs Section (PAS) of the U.S. Department of State is pleased to announce that funding is available through its Public Diplomacy Small Grants Program. This is an Annual Program Statement, outlining our funding priorities, the strategic themes we focus on, and the procedures for submitting requests for funding.  Please carefully follow all instructions below.
Purpose of Small Grants: PAS Phnom Penh invites proposals for projects that strengthen ties between the U.S. and Cambodia through cultural and exchange programming that highlights shared values and promotes bilateral cooperation. All programs must include an American cultural element, or connection with American expert/s, organization/s, or institution/s in a specific field that will promote increased understanding of U.S. policy and perspectives.
Examples of PAS Small Grants Program projects include, but are not limited to
  • Academic and professional lectures, seminars and speaker programs;
  • Artistic and cultural workshops, joint performances and exhibitions;
  • Cultural heritage conservation and preservation projects;
  • Professional and academic exchanges and projects;
Priority Program Areas:
  • Promoting a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Region
  • Strengthening the understanding of civic engagement: making use of the interconnections of modern society to strengthen democracy and the respect of human rights.
  • Supporting a rules-based order that advances democratic governance and resolving disputes peacefully.
  • Strengthening international resolve to work towards the denuclearization of the DPRK.
  • Protecting the environment, particularly through youth participation.
  • Promoting economic growth and sustainable development by encouraging fair and reciprocal trade and transparent, high-quality investment.
  • Empowering women and youth to spur economic growth.
  • Protecting and preserving Cambodian cultural heritage and celebrating Cambodia’s recent progress and development.
  • Promoting the development of STEM education among Cambodian youth.
Participants and Audiences:
This funding opportunity is available to organizations and individuals who are interested and have experience working with the above topics. The audiences should target the groups listed above, depending on the focus of the project.
The following types of projects are not eligible for funding:
  • Projects relating to partisan political activity;
  • Charitable or development activities;
  • Construction projects;
  • Projects that support specific religious activities;
  • Fund-raising campaigns;
  • Lobbying for specific legislation or projects;
  • Projects intended primarily for the growth or institutional development of the organization; or
  • Projects that duplicate existing projects.
Authorizing legislation, type and year of funding:
Funding authority rests in the Smith-Mundt or Fulbright-Hays. The source of funding is FY2019 Public Diplomacy Funding.

 B. FEDERAL AWARD INFORMATION

Length of performance period: 3 to 12 months
Number of awards anticipated: Multiple awards (dependent on amounts)
Award amounts: Awards may range from a minimum of $4,000 to a maximum of $20,000
Total available funding: Subject to availability
Type of Funding:  Fiscal Year 2019 Public Diplomacy Funding
Anticipated project start date: Flexible
This notice is subject to availability of funding.
Funding Instrument Type:  Grant, Fixed Amount Award, or Cooperative Agreement.
Project Performance Period: Proposed projects should be completed in 12 months or less.
PAS will entertain applications for continuation grants funded under these awards beyond the initial budget period on a non-competitive basis subject to availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the program, and a determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of the U.S. Department of State.  Preference will given to proposals that allow for sufficient time between submission of the proposal and initiation of the proposed project (generally at least three months).

C. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

  1. Eligible Applicants
The Public Affairs Section encourages applications from U.S. and Cambodia
  • Registered not-for-profit organizations, including think tanks and civil society/non-governmental organizations with programming experience
  • Individuals
  • Non-profit or governmental educational institutions
  • Governmental institutions
For-profit or commercial entities are not eligible to apply.  
  1. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing is not required.
  1. Other Eligibility Requirements
In order to be eligible to receive an award, all organizations must have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number from Dun & Bradstreet, as well as a valid registration on www.SAM.gov. Please see Section D.3 for information on how to obtain these registrations.  Individuals are not required to have a DUNS number or be registered in SAM.gov.

D. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

  1. Address to Request Application Package
Application forms required below are available to download directly by just clicking the title of each form below.
  1. Content and Form of Application Submission
Please follow all instructions below carefully. Proposals that do not meet the requirements of this announcement or fail to comply with the stated requirements will be ineligible.
Content of Application
Please ensure:
  • The proposal clearly addresses the goals and objectives of this funding opportunity
  • All documents are in English
  • All budgets are in U.S. dollars
  • All pages are numbered
  • All documents are formatted to 8 ½ x 11 paper, and
  • All Microsoft Word documents are single-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, with a minimum of 1-inch margins.
The following documents are required:
  1. Mandatory application forms

  1. Summary Coversheet: Cover sheet stating the applicant name and organization, proposal date, project title, project period proposed start and end date, and brief purpose of the project.
  2. Proposal (10 pages maximum): The proposal should contain sufficient information that anyone not familiar with it would understand exactly what the applicant wants to do. You may use your own proposal format, but it must include all the items below.
  • Proposal Summary: Short narrative that outlines the proposed project, including project objectives and anticipated impact.
  • Introduction to the Organization or Individual applying: A description of past and present operations, showing ability to carry out the project, including information on all previous grants from the U.S. Embassy and/or U.S. government agencies.
  • Problem Statement: Clear, concise and well-supported statement of the problem to be addressed and why the proposed project is needed
  • Project Goals and Objectives:  The “goals” describe what the project is intended to achieve.  What aspect of the relationship between the U.S. and Cambodia will be improved? The “objectives” refer to the intermediate accomplishments on the way to the goals. These should be achievable and measurable.
  • Project Activities: Describe the project activities and how they will help achieve the objectives.
  • Program Methods and Design: A description of how the project is expected to work to solve the stated problem and achieve the goal.
  • Proposed Project Schedule:  The proposed timeline for the project activities.  Include the dates, times, and locations of planned activities and events.
  • Key Personnel: Names, titles, roles and experience/qualifications of key personnel involved in the project.  What proportion of their time will be used in support of this project?
  • Project Partners:  List the names and type of involvement of key partner organizations and sub-awardees.
  • Project Monitoring and Evaluation Plan: This is an important part of successful grants. Throughout the time-frame of the grant, how will the activities be monitored to ensure they are happening in a timely manner, and how will the program be evaluated to make sure it is meeting the goals of the grant?
  • Future Funding or Sustainability Applicant’s plan for continuing the program beyond the grant period, or the availability of other resources, if applicable.
  1. Budget Justification Narrative: After filling out the SF-424A Budget (above), use a separate sheet of paper to describe each of the budget expenses in detail. See section H. Other Information: Guidelines for Budget Submissions below for further information.
  2. Attachments
  • 1-page CV or resume of key personnel who are proposed for the project
  • Letters of support from project partners describing the roles and responsibilities of each partner
  • If your organization has a NICRA and includes NICRA charges in the budget, your latest NICRA should be included as a PDF file.
  • Official permission letters, if required for project activities
  • Unique Entity Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM.gov)
Required Registrations:
All organizations applying for grants (except individuals) must obtain these registrations.  All are free of charge:
  • Unique Identifier Number from Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS number)
  • NCAGE/CAGE code
  • SAM.gov registration
Step 1: Apply for a DUNS number and an NCAGE number (these can be completed simultaneously)
DUNS application: Organizations must have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number from Dun & Bradstreet, if your organization does not have one already, you may obtain one by calling 1-866-705-5711 or visiting http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform/displayHomePage.do;jsessionid=81407B1F03F2BDB123DD47D19158B75F. http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform
NCAGE application: Application page here https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx
Instructions for the NCAGE application process:
https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/Docs/US%20Instructions%20for%20NSPA%20NCAGE.pdf
For help from within the U.S., call 1-888-227-2423
For help from outside the U.S., call 1-269-961-7766
Email NCAGE@dlis.dla.mil for any problems in getting an NCAGE code.
Step 2: After receiving the NCAGE Code, proceed to register in SAM by logging onto: https://www.sam.gov.  SAM registration must be renewed annually.
  1. Submission Dates and Times
The Public Affairs Section will accept proposals throughout the year and will review proposals according to the following schedule:
  • Proposals received between November 1 and January 31 will be reviewed by February 15, with responses going out by March 1. 
    • Proposals received between February 1 and April 30 will be reviewed by May 15, with responses going out by May 31.
    • Proposals received between May 1 and July 31 will be reviewed by August 15, with responses going out by August 31.
  • Proposals received between August 1 and September 1 will be reviewed by September 15 with responses going out by September 20.
  1. Funding Restrictions
U.S. Embassy Phnom Penh will not consider applications that reflect any type of support for any member, affiliate, or representative of a designated terrorist organization. No entity listed on the Excluded Parties List System in SAM is eligible for any assistance.
Federal awards generally will not allow reimbursement of pre-Federal award costs; however, the Grants Officer may approve pre-awards cost on a case by case basis. Generally, construction costs are not allowed under U.S. Embassy Phnom Penh awards.
  1. Other Submission Requirements
All application materials must be submitted by email to PASExchanges@state.gov.

E. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION

  1. Criteria
Each application will be evaluated and rated on the basis of the evaluation criteria outlined below. The criteria listed are closely related and are considered as a whole in judging the overall quality of an application.
Organizational capacity and record on previous grants: The organization has expertise in its stated field and PAS is confident of its ability to undertake the project.  This includes a financial management system and a bank account.
Quality and Feasibility of the Program Idea – The program idea is well developed, with detail about how project activities will be carried out. The proposal includes a reasonable implementation timeline.
Goals and objectives: Goals and objectives are clearly stated and project approach is likely to provide maximum impact in achieving the proposed results.
Embassy priorities: Applicant has clearly described how stated goals are related to and support U.S. Embassy Phnom Penh’s priority areas or target audiences.
Budget: The budget justification is detailed.  Costs are reasonable in relation to the proposed activities and anticipated results. The budget is realistic, accounting for all necessary expenses to achieve proposed activities.
Monitoring and evaluation plan: Applicant demonstrates it is able to measure program success against key indicators and provides milestones to indicate progress toward goals outlined in the proposal. The project includes output and outcome indicators, and shows how and when those will be measured.
Sustainability: Project activities will continue to have positive impact after the end of the project.
  1. Review and Selection Process
A Grants Review Committee will evaluate all eligible applications.

F. FEDERAL AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION

  1. Federal Award Notices
The grant, fixed amount award or cooperative agreement will be written, signed, awarded, and administered by the Grants Officer. The assistance award agreement is the authorizing document and it will be provided to the recipient for review and signature by email. The recipient may only start incurring project expenses beginning on the start date shown on the grant award document signed by the Grants Officer.
If a proposal is selected for funding, the Department of State has no obligation to provide any additional future funding. Renewal of an award to increase funding or extend the period of performance is at the discretion of the Department of State.
Issuance of this NOFO does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the U.S. government, nor does it commit the U.S. government to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of proposals. Further, the U.S. government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received.
Payment Method: Payments will be made in at least two installments, as needed to carry out the project activities.
Organizations whose applications will not be funded will also be notified via email.
  1. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions: Before submitting an application, applicants should review all the terms and conditions and required certifications which will apply to this award, to ensure that they will be able to comply.  These include:
2 CFR 2002 CFR 600, Certifications and Assurances, and the Department of State Standard Terms and Conditions, all of which are available at:  https://www.statebuy.state.gov/fa/pages/home.aspx
Note the U.S Flag branding and marking requirements in the Standard Terms and Conditions.
  1. Reporting
Reporting Requirements: Recipients will be required to submit financial reports and program reports.  The award document will specify how often these reports must be submitted.

G. FEDERAL AWARDING AGENCY CONTACTS

If you have any questions about the grant application process, please contact the Public Affairs Section at: PASExchanges@state.gov.
Note:  We do not provide any pre-consultation for application related questions that are addressed in the NOFO. Once an application has been submitted, State Department officials and staff — both in the Department and at embassies overseas — may not discuss this competition with applicants until the entire proposal review process is completed.

H. OTHER INFORMATION

Guidelines for Budget Justification
Personnel: Describe the wages, salaries, and benefits of temporary or permanent staff who will be working directly for the applicant on the project, and the percentage of their time that will be spent on the project.
Travel: Estimate the costs of travel and per diem for this project. If the project involves international travel, include a brief statement of justification for that travel.
Equipment: Describe any machinery, furniture, or other personal property that is required for the project, which has a useful life of more than one year (or a life longer than the duration of the project), and costs at least $5,000 per unit.
Supplies: List and describe all the items and materials, including any computer devices, that are needed for the project. If an item costs more than $5,000 per unit, then put it in the budget under Equipment.
Contractual: Describe goods and services that the applicant plans to acquire through a contract with a vendor.  Also describe any sub-awards to non-profit partners that will help carry out the project activities.
Other Direct Costs: Describe other costs directly associated with the project, which do not fit in the other categories. For example, shipping costs for materials and equipment or applicable taxes. All “Other” or “Miscellaneous” expenses must be itemized and explained.
Indirect Costs:  These are costs that cannot be linked directly to the project activities, such as overhead costs needed to help keep the organization operating.  If your organization has a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate (NICRA) and includes NICRA charges in the budget, attach a copy of your latest NICRA. Organizations that have never had a NICRA may request indirect costs of 10% of the modified total direct costs as defined in 2 CFR 200.68.
“Cost Sharing” refers to contributions from the organization or other entities other than the U.S. Embassy.   It also includes in-kind contributions such as volunteers’ time and donated venues.
Alcoholic Beverages:  Please note that award funds cannot be used for alcoholic beverages.

image (not from entry) from
Image result for enjoy your drink

Oakland native Catherine Baker wins Rangel Fellowship


Staff Reports, wvnews.com

Image result for rangel fellowship
image from

OAKLAND — On Nov. 9, Oakland native Catherine Baker was awarded a 2019 Charles B. Rangel International Affairs Fellowship following a highly competitive nationwide contest.

The Rangel Fellowship, funded by the U.S. Department of State and administered by Howard University, supports extraordinary individuals who want to pursue a career in the U.S. Foreign Service.

“We are thrilled that Catherine will be joining the Rangel Program,” said Rangel Program Director Patricia Scroggs. “Growing up in the Oakland, Catherine became committed to a career of public service and will be an outstanding representative of both Garrett County and the United States as a U.S. diplomat. I am confident that she will excel in graduate school and the Foreign Service. I look forward to seeing all that she will accomplish in her career.”

Baker, the daughter of Dale and Susan Baker, was born and raised in Garrett County. With a growing interest in international affairs and public service, Baker used her high school years to deepen her knowledge, spending multiple years in internationally-focused activities like Model U.N., creating a globally focused charity project and teaching herself French.

She attended college at the University of Maryland, where she majored in Environmental Science and Policy, minored in French and was selected for the International Studies cohort of the College Park Scholars Program. This program on international political relations and ethics offered her the opportunity to spend five months in southern France where she attended French university, taught at a local school, and completed an independent study on differences in cultural identity between the United States and Europe.

Returning, she entered a French immersion program and was selected as a Global Fellow, which combined a seminar on global policy challenges with an internship in the State Department’s Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs.

During this internship at the State Department, she learned about careers in the Foreign Service and decided to pursue a career representing the United States as as a Public Diplomacy [JB emphasis] Officer.

In 2016, she received a State Department Critical Language Scholarship to learn Urdu in an intensive immersion program in India. Learning Urdu allowed her to augment her existing language skills, study the growing strategic importance of South Asia, and function as a cultural intermediary as she formed relationships with my instructors, host family, and language partner.

Since returning from India, she has worked for the Department of State’s Foreign Service Institute, where she supports the Dean of the School of Language Studies, Ambassador Wanda Nesbitt.

“I am absolutely elated to be joining such a prestigious group,” Baker said. “The work that Rangel Fellows do before and after joining the Foreign Service is incredible and I cannot wait to begin my academic and professional journey among these new peers.”

The Rangel Fellowship will support Baker through a two-year graduate program to receive a master’s degree in an area of relevance to the Foreign Service. It will also provide extensive professional development opportunities, including internships, mentors, and skills training.

As part of the Rangel Program, Baker will work for a member of Congress on issues related to foreign affairs in summer 2019. In summer 2020, the U.S. Department of State will send her overseas to work in a U.S. embassy to get hands-on experience with foreign policy and the work of the Foreign Service.

Upon graduation, Baker will become a U.S. diplomat.

Marise Payne: charting the battle lines for Australian security


Alex Oliver, The Interpreter

Payne image from

Excerpt:
Comparisons are inevitable. ...
  • Foreign Minister Marise Payne’s speech comes after a concerted run of major foreign and defence policy speeches, each laden with announcements as the major parties joust in unofficial campaign mode running up to the 2019 federal election. ...
  • The New Colombo Plan: this was a signature initiative of Payne’s predecessor and an effective public diplomacy [JB emphasis] Australians’ Asia literacy by supporting scholarships for students to study and intern in the region.
  • The Government’s broadcasting review and Foreign Affairs’ review of Australia’s soft power in the region weren’t mentioned in the speech. In answer to a question on them, Payne referred to the government’s plans to work with commercial partners to increase access to Australian content in the Pacific. Wong referred specifically to the cutting of public broadcasting to the Pacific and the need to remedy it. ...

Meet the nation’s brightest young minds at the Youth Speak Summit in Chennai


chennai.citizenmatters.in


YOUTH SPEAK SUMMIT 2018
November 30, 2018 News Desk

Youth Speak Summit will feature an exciting lineup of speakers from various fields and other activities. Pic: Youth Speak Summit 2018/ Facebook

Youth Speak Summit 2018, a collaborative initiative of the U.S. Consulate General, Chennai and NalandaWay Foundation, is a two-day conference that will bring together young people from various spheres in one platform to learn, share, and inspire change. The summit will take place December 1-2, 2018 at the Madras Management Association Centre, Anna Salai, Chennai.

The summit will comprise curated talks, panel discussions, workshops, contests, and art by some of the most inspiring minds in the country. The sessions will include talks by youth icons, discussions on issues, storytelling by young change-makers, clinics for counseling, panel discussions, human library, workshops, skill sharing sessions, and much more. Popular filmmaker Pa Ranjith will deliver the key note address on December 1st.

Summit goers will have the opportunity to network with mentors, experts, and fellow change-makers, and also enjoy comedic and musical performances.

“The United States and India share the distinction of being the world’s oldest and largest democracies respectively,” according to U.S. Consul for Public Diplomacy [JB emphasis] and Public affairs Lauren Lovelace, “And the future of our democracies depends on our young people. Youth Speak Summit 2018 seeks to empower young leaders who exemplify the best of our societies.”

Highlights of the Summit:

Social Entrepreneurship Pitch Fest

In association with Ashoka Youth Venture, the Youth Speak Summit 2018 will host a pitch fest where passionate, socially minded and entrepreneurial 18 to 30-year-olds will pitch their proposals. The five best proposals selected by a panel of experts will win a cash prize of Rs 50,000. The proposals must focus on creating positive change in the community. The candidates must also have a plan to implement a pilot within 3 months and will be mentored by expert social entrepreneurs.

Human Library

Every person is like a book with stories and knowledge to share. The Human Library space at the Youth Summit allows the participants to walk-in, listen to stories, and engage in conversations. This provides a great opportunity for building empathy, breaking stereotypes, and building social tolerance. Anyone can come “borrow” a human book for 45 minutes.

Skill Share Garden

The Skill Share Garden allows the participants to exchange skills with others. If one has a skill and would like to swap it with another skill, this is the place for it. From origami to writing to painting, or making clay objects, this is the space in the Youth Summit that offers a fun learning experience.

Change Maker Stories

A series of short presentations by change makers from all walks of life – artists, activists, environmentalists, innovators, and entrepreneurs. In an engaging storytelling format, the speakers will share their passion for positive change and how they translated their vision into meaningful action.

Other Sessions:

The Summit also includes counseling clinics presented by Banyan, #BeyondFilter, a photography exhibition in association with Chennai Photo Biennale and a Graffiiti Wall for the participants to engage in art. The winning entries of the Chennai Photo Biennale exhibition will receive prizes.

“Today, there is a clear and important need for creating a safe non-threatening space for youngsters to express their challenges to people who matter. Young people have great ideas and we believe its time the world takes them seriously. The Youth Speak Summit is to bring together young people to learn and share about things that matter to them,” says Sriram Ayer, Founder & CEO, NalandaWay Foundation”

About NalandaWay Foundation

Nalandaway Foundation uses visual and performing arts to help children from disadvantaged communities in India. Our endeavor is to improve learning abilities, reinforce positive behavior, and help children soar high by enabling them to be creative and express through Arts. For more details visit www.nalandaway.org

About Ashoka: Innovators of the Public

Ashoka is the world’s largest network of leading social entrepreneurs in the world. Founded in the United States, Ashoka identifies and invests in leading social entrepreneurs with innovative and practical ideas for solving social problems. Ashoka India functions as a collaborative network that supports and amplifies change by bringing together these change makers.

For more details, visit: https://www.youthspeak2018.org

Cadets compete in English war of words


Korea JoongAng Daily

Speakers came from army, navy, air force and nursing academies  Dec 01,2018
이미지뷰
Winners of the 1st Cadet Public Speaking Competition gather on stage after the awards ceremony held at
the Korea Military Academy (KMA) in Nowon District, northern Seoul, on Friday. Ryu Kwon-ha, chief
executive officer of the Korea JoongAng Daily, stands far left, and Jeon Seong-hyeon, director of academy
affairs at the KMA, stands far right. The JoongAng Daily and the KMA co-hosted the event, in which
cadets from the military, naval, air force and nursing academies had to give a five-minute speech in English
 on how cadet life has changed the way they think and act. [PARK SANG-MOON]
Thirty cadets from the military, naval, air force and nursing academies faced off in the 1st Cadet Public Speaking Competition held at the Korea Military Academy (KMA) in Nowon District, northern Seoul, on Friday.

The contest, co-hosted by the KMA and the Korea JoongAng Daily, was the latest project between the university and the paper to boost cooperation in English education. Both sides signed a memorandum of understanding toward that goal a month ago.

Cadets were given five minutes to explain in English how cadet life has changed the way they think and act in front of judges from the KMA, the Korea JoongAng Daily and the Committee of ITT.

The Grand Prize went to Lee Ha-min, a senior at the KMA, who explained how she managed to go from denying others’ thoughts that were different from her own to accepting those ideas through her four years at the university. Lee Jeong-yeon, a sophomore at the Republic of Korea Naval Academy, and Yang Eun-ju, a sophomore at the Korea Armed Forces Nursing Academy, both went home with the Gold Prize.

Silver prizes went to Jo Yo-han, a junior at KMA; Cho Chang-hyun, a junior at the Korea Air Force Academy; and Kim Ji-won, a sophomore at KMA. Bronze prizes were awarded to Ryu Eun-jin, a sophomore at the Korea Armed Forces Nursing Academy; Eom Sae-jin, a sophomore at the Korea Air Force Academy; and Ju Young-jun, a senior at KMA.

Winners of the Participation Prize were Kwak Ji-hyeon, a junior at KMA; Jeong Ji-hee, a sophomore at the Korea Armed Forces Nursing Academy; and Kang Min-soo, a senior at KMA.

Creative prizes were awarded to Jung Kyung-won, a sophomore at KMA; Bae Young-jun, a freshman at KMA; and Kim Hyun-il, a sophomore at the Korea Air Force Academy.

Winners of the grand and gold prizes will be invited to the Korea JoongAng Daily’s annual Public Diplomacy [JB emphasis] Night next Wednesday in Gangnam District, southern Seoul, where Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon will give a presentation on public diplomacy to a crowd including ambassadors and their spouses.

The contest was sponsored by U Education, the Committee of ITT and the International Tour Travel Agency. The cadet public speaking competition will be held annually. Cooperation between the Korea JoongAng Daily and the KMA goes back to mid-September, when junior cadets majoring in English visited the media company’s newsroom to learn about journalism.

BY LEE SUNG-EUN [lee.sungeun@joongang.co.kr]

China wants academics and think tank members to help defuse tensions with US


Wendy Wu, South China Morning Post, 30 November 2018

China wants academics and think tank members to help defuse tensions with US

Researchers can stay in the United States for some government-backed think tanks and specialists familiar with US-China relations, said one of the sources, speaking on condition of anonymity.
They added that one of the challenges for Beijing was the difficulty of conveying its message to the conservative think tanks that have influence over the administration of US President Donald Trump.
The South China Morning Post reported earlier that Beijing had limited to one week trips to the US by Chinese researchers, who complained the restriction would only add to China’s lack of understanding about the situation there. Researchers and observers also said the restriction was one of the reasons Beijing was not aware that Washington aimed to go through with its tariff threats until the first round of duties was imposed in July.
The lifting of the travel restriction for a small number of academics comes as China and the United States are making efforts to break the trade war deadlock.
“The leadership has called for public diplomacy [JB emphasis] or non-official contact with Americans to get a clearer picture of the US thinking on China and to find alternative communication channels,” said a second source, who also declined to be named.
Beijing has found it hard to find a backchannel for dialogue with Trump’s inner circle, and observers said familiar Wall Street insiders were accessible but their influence on the hawkish US administration was waning.
In addition, without any substantial progress on its promises to reform and open up, Beijing is losing the support of those in Washington who have previously pushed for closer engagement with China.

Trump-Xi G20 dinner unlikely to end in joint statement, regardless of outcome

The most recent example came from former US Treasury secretary Henry Paulson, who is believed to have once played a role in promoting bilateral relations with China. Paulson told a forum in early November that the rift between Washington and Beijing could lead to an “economic iron curtain”, saying relations were at a crossroads and that China needed to make bold reforms.
Tao Wenzhao, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said more communication with US experts was needed – especially in the face of rising populism in America.
“It shouldn’t be about fast results when communicating with conservative think tanks,” Tao said. “It will take time to foster a better understanding of the situation.”
In recent months, one think tank based in Beijing, the Centre for China and Globalisation, has sought exchanges with several influential conservative think tanks in the United States. Its members visited and held discussions with those from the Hudson Institute, Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute in late September and early October.
Meanwhile, the Post reported last week that the US embassy in Beijing had revoked 10-year multiple-entry visas issued to some researchers specialising in China-US relations without explanation amid tightened visa scrutiny.
Beijing’s restrictions on liberal scholars have also continued. At the start of November, Shen Hong, from the independent Unirule Institute of Economics, was barred from leaving China to attend a seminar at Harvard University on the grounds the economist would “endanger national security”.
With China and the United States locked in a trade war since July, Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping are expected to discuss ways to end the hostilities when they meet after the Group of 20 summit in Buenos Aires this weekend. But even if they can agree to a truce on tariffs, tensions over China’s trade practices and technology development will remain.

Public-Diplomacy Blast from the Past -- on the sad occasion of the tragic death of an American missionary


Image from, with caption:  A photo Mr. Chau posted on Instagram on Oct. 21, five days after landing on Port Blair for the last time.

Article by your Public Diplomacy Review compiler in the Huffington Post (2011); "Public Diplomacy [JB emphasis]: The World Should Be Teaching Us, Mr. Kristof"; reluctantly reposted -- given the tragic death of a young man, the missionary John Allen Chau, killed on a remote Indian Ocean island, where he traveled with a waterproof Bible -- but my piece, doubtless off mark to some, may be indirectly pertinent to well meaning and idealistic Peace Corps volunteers; see also (1) (2 [a dated New Yorker piece on the Peace Corps]

Here's my Huffington Post article:

Well-meaning Nicholas D. Kristof in the New York Times:

“Peace Corps and Teach for America represent the best ethic of public service. But at a time when those programs can’t meet the demand from young people seeking to give back, we need a new initiative: Teach for the World.

In my mind, Teach for the World would be a one-year program placing young Americans in schools in developing countries. The Americans might teach English or computer skills, or coach basketball or debate teams. ...

This would be a government-financed effort to supplement an American public diplomacy [JB emphasis] outreach that has been eviscerated over the last few decades.”

Mr. Kristof, who wants young Americans to teach English the world over, seems unaware that all too many of us here in the homeland (which is how we now identify our cry-the-beloved country in these sad post-9/11 times) are incapable of writing a coherent English sentence free of grammatical and spelling errors. And how many of us called-to-duty language missionaries currently living in said homeland, if volunteering to coach “debate teams” overseas, could actually be capable of crafting a logical argument, given our 24/7 we-can’t-stop-loving-it culture of instant mindless gratification a la Tee-Vee & Twitter & uptalk?

“I mean, like you know, whatever” — such is, increasingly, our American contribution to serious world-wide discourse.

Well, OK, post-modern language/argument, without oh-so-boring grammar or logic, is maybe what we in the New World have to offer to our globalized planet. No problem. (Actually, I’m all for this Americanization, until I read, as I often do, a paper “written” by a computer-savvy US undergraduate that makes absolutely no, I mean absolutely no, sense, not even, dare I say, from a “post-modernist” perspective).

In my Foreign Service career, I found many distinguished foreigners who spoke English better than I did (and pray tell, Mr. Kristof, what is a “developing country”? Detroit, Michigan?). These distinguished foreigners had actually read, very carefully, English-language classics and knew the fundamentals of classical rhetoric, hence their ability to engage in serious debate. I thought they should be teaching me.

As for the Peace Corps, its main drawbacks are twofold.

(A) Giving jobs to too many well meaning but desperately-seeking-to-be-employed, résumé-driven, undereducated provincial American BA’s with, all too often, little or no knowledge of foreign languages/cultures or substantial skills, personal or intellectual, even in teaching (or speaking) their own native language.

There are, of course, notable exceptions, including “senior citizens” in the program; but much of the Peace Corps is, I would suggest, an updated, “democratic” version of a vast system of outdoor relief for the upper classes [JB note -- link not in the original article].

In all fairness, these well-meaning, often naive, Peace Corps volunteers (I had the privilege of meeting many of them in my Foreign Service career), may be eager to learn about the outside world. But if they are parachuted to teach/“set an example” in other countries, they should know far more about them (and their own country and language) than Peace Corps “training” provides (and by the time they know something about where they are, they are shipped out).

(B) As suggested by the above remarks, most sadly and importantly, the Peace Corps is not a bilateral program. In essence, “we” (the U.S.) are telling “them” (the “foreigners”) what to do (in a gentle way) — a twentieth-century Cold War one-way-communications propaganda model, granted on a perhaps laudable human level.

But today (I won’t say at a time of US “decline”) we “altruistic” American taxpayers could certainly use highly-skilled volunteers from other countries, including math teachers from “developing countries,” for our poorly performing public secondary schools, in exchange for our own volunteers, who would be far more skilled than many in our well-meaning Peace Corps currently are. In this way we would be honestly serving our own interests, while at the same time asking for the world’s cooperation, when and where we need it.

The world should teaching us, Mr. Kristof, in more ways than one. Not just the U.S. teaching the world. Time for a real deal.