Sunday, April 16, 2017

Congress Just EXPOSED George Soros, Obama, And Clinton- People Are Going To PRISON!


success-street.com

Soros image from article
Excerpt:
While Democrats are freaking out over Russian supposedly meddling in the elections of other nations, Republicans are focused on George Soros’ alleged meddling in European politics and his involvement with the radical leftist movement here in America. 
Concerns about Soros’ involvement most recently were raised by the Hungarian prime minister, who last week lashed out at the Soros “empire” and accused it of deploying “tons of money and international heavy artillery,” Fox News reports.
But days earlier, Republican lawmakers in Washington started asking questions about whether U.S. tax dollars also were being used to fund Soros projects in the small, conservative-led country of Macedonia.
Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J., led a group of House lawmakers in writing to Ambassador Jess Baily — an Obama appointee — demanding answers. “It seems that the U.S. government funded organizations that have taken sides, specifically, the side of the socialists, which is absolutely unacceptable. I think this is illegal and we will examine this case to the fullest extent,” he said.
“We need to have a detailed oversight into what the administration has been doing over the past eight years because we have been taking sides politically in other countries as well, and there have been other similar incidents. That undermines U.S. public diplomacy and our diplomacy in general. It is against the law and is unheard of, ” Smith said. ... 
***

JB comment on the above, in reaction to critical comments about it (and the person who posted it on his blog) on Facebook [slightly amended]

Friends: I posted the above article (with its, granted, silly/provocative headline), because it pertains not to my personal opinions, but to the topic of my blog (public diplomacy - PD), given the article’s citation of a PD-related remark by a U.S. lawmaker (Rep. Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J.):  “ ‘We need to have a detailed oversight into what the administration has been doing over the past eight years because we have been taking sides politically in other countries as well, and there have been other similar incidents. That undermines U.S. public diplomacy and our diplomacy in general. It is against the law and is unheard of, Smith said.” 


FYI, the focus of my PD blog is on PD’s role in U.S./international politics, with an emphasis on its linguistic and historical evolution; the articles included in the blog are not chosen according to parti pris, ideological criteria, but according to their relevance to PD as an activity/subject of study (granted, from my not totally “unbiased” perspective as a former diplomat and author of lightly academic studies on public diplomacy). 

I must confess I do have one even perhaps greater bias that is reflected in the blog: occasionally choosing articles/images aimed, perhaps unsuccessfully, at making its readers laugh/smile/snicker (?) in these sad times.

It’s up to you to judge if the above discussed article, with its silly title, fits in that 'humorous" PD category, despite (because of?) its historically pertinent quotation by Congressman Smith .J


***
An exchange on Facebook re the above

Matt Armstrong Rather disappointing that John posted this 'story' from and with the headline of a known click-baiter / fake news site. Though he describes the headling as 'sillly / provacative', John provides another link to an equally dubious though more well-known conspiracy-laced website, zero-hedge, as if to validate his amplifying a so-called 'story' simply because the words 'public' and 'diplomacy' appeared next to each other. This is not 'silly' or 'humorous' PD but a not-so-subtle undermining that deserves, no requires, a proper disclaimer and commentary lest the repost furthers the aims of the sites. I am not defending Soros, but this is a genre with a methodology, not a one-off effort that is a real threat. In other words, it's irresponsible for a person interested and experienced in the 'linguistic and historical evolution' of PD, propaganda, and international relations to repost this to make readers 'laugh/smile/snicker'.
John Brown Matt - Thank you for your comment. May I note that my entry spells the word "provocative" correctly, whereas you write that "he describes the heading as 'silly/provacative' " -- thereby spreading fake news, by putting this of one words in quotation marks -- and thus, in this case, suggesting that I can't spell adequately. ... Not that I ever won a spelling bee in high school. 



No comments: